Zawinski’s law: a warning to prioritise and avoid product bloat.Empathy map: to consider the potential impact on a specific audience group.Agile methodology: an iterative approach that works well with this form of prioritisation.Second order thinking: considering beyond the immediate placement of cards.Cost-benefit analysis: another method of identifying relative value.Eisenhower matrix: which is a more individually targeted approach based on similar concepts.Pareto principle: in identifying the high value areas.
RICE score and kano as alternative prioritisation options.Almost every product team is trapped somehow untrapping them is what drives me. Partner at Value Rebels and interim CPO at omoqo. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above. Features Solutions David Pereira Follow Product Leader with 15+ years of experience. Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave the impact effort matrix into your broader latticework of mental models. It is a popular prioritisation tool in a range of domains with alternatives including RICE score and kano. The impact effort matrix is based on a common grid approach, inspired by models such as the Eisenhower matrix. Finally, consider if any of the ideas in the ‘no’ quadrants might be adapted or improved upon to move them to the other quadrants. low impact), best bets (high impact, low difficulty), low priority (high. Committing to the high impact and low effort quadrant, and discussing possibilities in the two ‘maybe’ quadrants. A quad chart for plotting items by relative importance and difficulty. Once the positioning is established, use the four quadrants to prioritise actions. Thankless tasks (low impact, high effort). At the same time, there might be opportunities to streamline and consolidate some of the similar or overlapping ideas. An action priority matrix is a diagram that helps people determine which tasks to focus on, and in which order. You might consider using a voting option here - with participants marking cards with stickers to represent agree, disagree or question. The discussion should focus on questioning and/or challenging the placement of cards as required with agreements left unspoken. Allow people to place cards on the grid as accurately as they can. This is typically done with a single idea being captured via a digital workspace or physical post-it note.ĭraw up the grid and provide an explanation of the axis, reminding participants of the project goals. Ensure that the team is clear about the goal, the audience, and what success looks like so they can make an informed judgement about the level of ‘impact’.Īllow the team to generate possible solutions or actions that will help to achieve the goal.
0 kommentar(er)
